MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405598367 · doi:10.5539/elt.v18n1p20

The Reality behind Doomsday: A Study of Crisis Writing in Oryx and Crake

2024· article· en· W4405598367 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Duan Qiuxia, Ru Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language Teaching · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaOryxHumanityFableEnvironmental ethicsDehumanizationAestheticsSociologyLiteratureLawArtPolitical scienceAnthropologyPhilosophyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oryx and Crake, as a typical dystopian scientific fiction, depicts incredible technology myth. Yet technology supermacy ultimately pushes human beings to the extinction during a pandemic. From the perspective of the tradition of crisis writing, this paper takes Margaret Atwood's classic dystopian novel Oryx and Crake as the object of study, and analyzes how Margaret Atwood exposes the imbalance between human beings and nature, deterioration of social institution and deprivation of humanity. She sharply criticizes the reality of contemporary western society behind the natural, technological and ethical crises throughout rich imaginations in this “revelatory” fable. On this basis, the unique aesthetic connotation of this novel is revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language TeachingSame topicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeFrench-language works237,207