MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405599777 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3520357

Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Real-Time Multi-Energy Management in Combined Heat and Power Microgrids

2024· article· en· W4405599777 on OpenAlexafffund
Bo Hu, Yuzhong Gong, Xiaodong Liang, C. Y. Chung, Bram Noble, Greg Poelzer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSaskPower
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceEnergy managementPower (physics)Energy (signal processing)Power managementReinforcementArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combined heat and power microgrids (CHPMGs) have become increasingly popular recently due to their ability to offer cost-effective and resilient solutions to support critical infrastructures. As the centerpiece of a CHPMG, an autonomous real-time multi-energy management system can leverage advanced metering infrastructure to monitor and dispatch various distributed energy resources (DERs), minimize operational costs, and improve the overall system reliability. In this paper, a novel real-time energy management system (EMS) for CHPMGs is proposed using a data-driven model-free safe deep reinforcement learning method. The energy management problem in CHPMGs is first formulated into a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP). A safe deep deterministic policy gradient (SDDPG) method is then applied to solve the developed CMDP. SDDPG features an actor-critic structure, in which the actor network learns the optimal control policy, and the critic network learns to evaluate the state-action value. To satisfy CHPMGs operational constraints during the training process, two sets of neural networks are proposed to approximate the constrained system parameters. A mathematical optimization-based safety layer is also constructed upon the actor network to analytically correct the agent’s actions into safe actions satisfying specific constraints. The proposed method is validated by case studies using real-world data; it is also compared with conventional deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and optimization-based approaches with and without accurate uncertainty data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207