MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Modelling Building-Integrated Photovoltaic/Thermal Systems: Sensitivity Analysis Insights

2024· article· en· W4405601381 on OpenAlexaff
Anna‐Maria Sigounis, Andreas Athienitis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSensitivity (control systems)ThermalComputer scienceSystems engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformation of buildings to solar-powered structures can support the evolution of the global energy network towards a decentralized and environmentally sustainable system. Building-integrated photovoltaics thermal (BIPV/T) systems can play a crucial role in this process by facilitating the decarbonization of the heating sector through electrification. By generating both electrical and thermal energy from the same surface area their overall efficiency is improved making them particularly advantageous in dense urban environments where space is limited. The main design parameters which influence the BIPV/T energy performance include geometric features of the system such as channel length and height, inclination, and orientation as well as control parameters such as the air flow rate that runs through the BIPV/T channel.In this study a sensitivity analysis on selected design parameters of a BIPV/T system coupled to an air-source heat pump is conducted to identify sensitive features that have the biggest impact on the system performance.Key findings include that longer BIPV/T channels heighten the importance of channel height in the thermal production of the BIPV/T system, while higher channel air velocities generally decrease the impact of geometric parameters. Finally, the analysis indicated that there is a critical range of channel heights and lengths within which the sensitivity of these parameters on the outlet temperature of the BIPV/T channel is maximized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→