Effect of a multimodal continuing professional development initiative on HIV testing in primary care in British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many persons are unaware of HIV infection until they present in an advanced stage of the disease. Diagnosing HIV infection in its earliest stages reduces morbidity and mortality and contributes to improved public health. Increased testing for HIV is critical for prevention, and primary care providers play an essential role in early HIV screening. However, lack of knowledge and confidence are barriers to the adoption of screening practices. Continuing professional development (CPD) may enhance greater HIV testing uptake amongst primary care providers by improving awareness and comfort. This paper aims to report on the impact of a multimodal CPD initiative to increase HIV screening and test ordering across primary care settings in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: The 'HIV Testing Initiative in Family Practice' was designed as a multimodal education strategy to encourage family physicians to adopt routine HIV testing in their practices. The initiative encompassed a variety of core and supplementary educational activities, including interactive in-person CPD workshops, practice resources, and patient education materials. An interrupted time series study was undertaken to evaluate the effect on HIV test ordering before and after workshop participation. Participants also completed post-workshop surveys to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: In total, 316 individuals participated in the core educational activities of the initiative. The number of HIV tests ordered increased significantly amongst participants following workshop participation (p < .001). HIV test ordering increased for both rural and urban providers with no significant difference (p = .075) on the number of tests ordered between these groups. Participants were very satisfied with workshop participation, with an overall mean satisfaction rating of 4.78 (out of 5) and reported high satisfaction with the format (4.64 out of 5) and interactivity (4.76 out of 5) features across the workshops. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that the introduction of a multimodal CPD intervention may have effected change in family physicians' HIV testing practices. The HIV testing rates of physicians who had participated in CPD workshops increased significantly, and participant evaluation data indicated a greater understanding of the rationale for routine HIV testing, as well as an increase in comfort with recommending HIV tests to patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".