MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405615172 · doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000932.v2

<xhtml:span xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">Anaerobic HgII reduction is driven by cellular HgII-thiol interactions</xhtml:span>

2024· preprint· en· W4405615172 on OpenAlexafffund
Noémie C. Lavoie, Alexandre J. Poulain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXHTMLXMLComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMarkup language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redox reactions play a critical role in determining the availability of mercury species, HgII and Hg0, to anaerobic microbes responsible for methylating inorganic mercury into toxic monomethylmercury. Some anaerobes also contribute to Hg cycling in methylation hotspots by reducing HgII to its gaseous elemental form, Hg0. However, their contributions remain poorly quantified due to limited mechanistic insights and the absence of genetic targets. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of anaerobic HgII reduction in the versatile anoxygenic photoheterotroph and fermenter Heliomicrobium modesticaldum Ice1. Given HgII strong electrophilic affinity for thiol groups, we hypothesized that cellular thiols are key interaction sites mediating HgII reduction. Exposure of H. modesticaldum to the thiol-alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), which irreversibly binds thiols, resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of Hg0 production during both photoheterotrophy and fermentation. Hg partitioning assays with Escherichia coli cells revealed no significant differences in Hg-cell partitioning in the presence or absence of NEM, suggesting that HgII reduction is dependent on intracellular thiol interactions. These findings highlight the importance of thiol-mediated pathways in Heliobacterial HgII reduction. Although the exact cellular components remain unidentified, we discuss potential thiol-containing coupling sites that warrant further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2270.178

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→