MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405616532 · doi:10.18261/pof.40.4.3

Styrets oppfølging av daglig leder

2024· article· no· W4405616532 on OpenAlexaff
Lars I. Pettersen

Bibliographic record

VenuePraktisk økonomi & finans · 2024
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Educational Sciences
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hvordan bør styret følge opp daglig leder med henblikk på å hindre misbruk av mandat eller stilling? Det er et spørsmål som ofte dukker opp i etterkant av medias søkelys på situasjoner hvor det har fremkommet kritikkverdig adferd fra daglig leder i form av disposisjoner som er foretatt, eller handlinger som ikke kan forsvares eller forstås ut fra selskapets formål eller virksomhet. Styrets forvaltnings- og tilsynsansvar tilsier at styret bør påse at det foreligger adekvate prosesser og rutiner som sørger for at de får tilstrekkelig informasjon og innsikt til å utføre sine oppgaver. I tillegg medvirker styrets holdning og signaler som sendes gjennom de handlinger styret utfører, til å forebygge at kritikkverdige handlinger fra daglig leder oppstår.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePraktisk økonomi & finansSame topicSocial and Educational SciencesFrench-language works237,207