Diminished functional gradient of the precuneus during altered states of consciousness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The relationship between the default mode network (DMN) and task-positive networks, such as the frontoparietal control network (FPCN), is a prominent feature of functional connectivity (FC) in the human brain. This relationship is primarily anticorrelated at rest in healthy brains and is disrupted in altered states of consciousness. Although the DMN and FPCN seem to perform distinct and even opposing roles, they are anatomically adjacent and exhibit ambiguous boundaries. To test the hypothesis that the DMN-FPCN distinction manifests probabilistically rather than having absolute anatomical boundaries, we examined the differences in FC along the dorsal-ventral (d-v) axis in the posterior precuneus (PCu), which serves a convergence zone between the DMN and FPCN. Our findings indicate that the connectivity differences along this axis are continuous as characterized by linear slopes. Notably, these linear relationships (i.e., functional gradients of the precuneus/FGp) are present only within the territories of the DMN and FPCN, respectively associating with positive and negative slopes. Furthermore, the gradient is functionally relevant, as its spatial configurations change in specific ways in altered states of consciousness (ASC): the magnitude of FGp is similarly impaired across different types of ASC, while the spatial entropy of FGp differs between psychedelic and sedative states. These results suggest that the DMN and FPCN, while appearing distinct, may originate from a single, integrated mechanism. Significance Statement This research provides new insights into the brain’s functional organization underlying human conscious states by examining the relationship between two large-scale networks: the default mode network (DMN) and the frontoparietal control network (FPCN). These networks, which are attuned to handle internal and external information respectively, are often viewed as oppositional. However, our findings indicate they form an integrated system with continuous connectivity. We identified the posterior precuneus as a key convergence point, revealing a gradient of connectivity between the two networks. This gradient flattens during altered states of consciousness induced by psychedelics or sedatives, showing a loss of functional differentiation between the DMN and FPCN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".