Exploring Financial Culture and Revenue Planning in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Public Sector Entities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between financial culture and financial planning, emphasizing their critical impact on organizational success and economic resilience. Financial culture, defined as the combination of financial knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, directly influences decision-making, revenue management, and long-term sustainability. Despite global challenges and economic disruptions, the relevance of financial culture persists, particularly in fostering innovation and adaptability within organizations. The research adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining a detailed literature review with in-depth interviews conducted with representatives of SMEs and public sector entities. The literature review highlights disparities in financial literacy and its implications for different sectors, focusing on legislative frameworks, financial decision-making processes, and sustainable financial practices. Primary research findings reveal that SMEs often face challenges such as limited resources and intense competition, while public institutions are shaped by strict regulatory frameworks that emphasize fiscal responsibility. The integration of circular economy principles into financial planning emerges as a significant strategy, offering opportunities to enhance resource efficiency and align financial practices with sustainability goals. Key results demonstrate the importance of financial literacy programs tailored to organizational needs, particularly for SMEs operating in dynamic and resource-constrained environments. Furthermore, adopting circular economy principles proves particularly beneficial in industries such as tourism development, which require sustainable resource management to ensure long-term viability. The findings offer practical insights for policymakers, educators, and business leaders, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to strengthen financial culture. By fostering financial literacy and incorporating sustainable practices, organizations can enhance their economic stability, competitiveness, and contribution to broader societal goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".