MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405622262 · doi:10.53095/88975027

Economic Freedom of North America 2024 Subnational Dataset

2024· report· en· W4405622262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dean Stansel, José Torra, Matthew D. Mitchell, Ángel Carrión-Tavárez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic freedomGeographyEconomic geographyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic Freedom of North America 2024 measures the degree to which governments in North America permit their citizens to make their own economic choices. The subnational dataset of the report encompasses data from the 10 Canadian provinces, the 50 U.S. states, the 31 Mexican states and Mexico City, and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico, for comparison of all 93 individual jurisdictions (provincial, state, and local governments) within the same country. Canada’s most economically free province is Alberta. The next highest provinces in the subnational index were Ontario and Manitoba, followed by Newfoundland & Labrador, and British Columbia. In the U.S., New Hampshire earned the top spot again this year. South Dakota rose to second and Florida fell to third, followed by Tennessee and Texas. Puerto Rico is the lowest-ranking U.S. jurisdiction by far. The most economically free of the Mexican states is Michoacán de Ocampo, followed by Baja California, Morelos, Jalisco, and Puebla.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFrench-language works237,207