MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405623200 · doi:10.1101/2024.12.20.629533

Structure of the type VI secretion protein VgrS from <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium

2024· preprint· en· W4405623200 on OpenAlexafffund
Kartik Sachar, Matthew Van Schepdael, Karen A. Winters, Gerd Prehna

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of ManitobaResearch ManitobaCanadian Light Source
KeywordsSalmonellaSecretionType three secretion systemMicrobiologyType (biology)ChemistryBiologyBiochemistryBacteriaGeneticsGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Enteric bacterial pathogens employ various strategies to colonize the intestine and cause diseases ranging from gastroenteritis to systemic infections. For example, Salmonella enterica utilizes a nanomachine known as the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to facilitate colonization of the host gut. However, the varied mechanistic details of how the T6SS is loaded with effector proteins remains to be elucidated. Here, we present an X-ray crystal structure of the Salmonella Typhimurium VgrG (VgrS) that serves as platform for T6SS effector loading. Compared to other known structures of VgrG proteins, the VgrS trimer adopts an alternative open conformation composed of a domain-swap between the monomers in the gp27 region. Additionally, a comparative structural analysis of VgrS with other VgrG proteins reveals molecular variations that may contribute to specific effector loading mechanisms. Our structural data and molecular analysis highlight the observation that the T6SS of each bacterial species or strain is unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207