Fitness translocation: improving variant effect prediction with biologically-grounded data augmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Data scarcity limits the characterization of protein fitness landscapes and the development of accurate variant effect prediction models. To address this challenge, we introduce fitness translocation, a data augmentation strategy that generates synthetic variants for a target protein by leveraging variant fitness data previously measured in homologous proteins. Using embeddings from protein language models, the method computes the difference between each homolog variant and its wild type and applies these offsets to the target wild-type embedding to create synthetic variants in embedding space. RESULTS: We illustrate the utility of fitness translocation in the context of variant effect prediction on three protein families: IGPS, GFP, and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, across different models and training data sizes. Fitness translocation consistently improves predictive performance, particularly under limited training data, and is effective even when augmenting with remote homologs sharing as little as 35% sequence identity. These results illustrate how biologically grounded data augmentation can expand and diversify protein fitness landscapes, supporting more data-efficient protein engineering. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/adrienmialland/ProtFitTrans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".