Umbrella Sampling MD Simulations for Retention Prediction in Peptide Reversed-phase Liquid Chromatography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) is an essential tool for separating complex mixtures such as proteolytic digests in bottom-up proteomics. There is growing interest in methods that can predict the RPLC retention behavior of peptides and other analytes. Already, existing algorithms provide excellent performance based on empirical rules or large sets of RPLC training data. Here we explored a new type of retention prediction strategy that relies on first-principles modeling of peptide interactions with a C18 stationary phase. We recently demonstrated that molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can provide atomistic insights into the behavior of peptides under RPLC conditions ( Anal . Chem . 2023, 95, 3892). However, the current work found that it is problematic to use conventional MD data for retention prediction, evident from a poor correlation between experimental retention times and MD-generated “fraction bound” values. We thus turned to umbrella sampling MD, a complementary technique that has previously been applied to probe noncovalent contacts in other types of systems. By restraining the peptide dynamic motions at various positions inside a C18-lined pore, we determined the free energy of the system as a function of peptide-stationary phase distance. Δ G binding values determined in this way under various mobile phase conditions were linearly correlated with experimental retention times of tryptic test peptides. This work opens retention prediction avenues for novel types of stationary and mobile phases, and for peptides (or other analytes) having arbitrary chemical properties, without the need for RPLC reference data. Umbrella sampling can be used as a stand-alone tool, or it may serve to enhance existing retention prediction algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".