MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405632172 · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106876

Mechanical properties of the bicipital aponeurosis

2024· article· en· W4405632172 on OpenAlexafffund
Emmanuel Ocran, Michele Oliver, Anne Agur, Amr Elmaraghy, Karen Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAponeurosisMaterials scienceAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a biarticular muscle, the biceps brachii both supinates the forearm and flexes the elbow and shoulder, thus allowing the upper limb to perform a variety of activities of daily living (ADL). The biceps brachii originates on the coracoid apex as well as the supraglenoid tubercle and inserts on the radial tuberosity. At the distal end, the bicipital aponeurosis (BA) provides a transition of the biceps tendon into the antebrachial fascia. Previous work has reported the importance of the bicipital aponeurosis in stabilizing distal tendons. Other studies have reported the supination effect that the BA has on the forearm at the radioulnar joint, where it also protects the brachial artery and median nerve (neurovascular bundle). In addition, it has been speculated to have a proprioceptive function. However, despite the important functions fulfilled by this structure, the mechanical properties of the BA are yet to be quantified. Mechanical properties for eight fresh frozen BA specimens (82 ± 12 years, 5 females, 5 right) were quantified using a Cellscale Biaxial (Waterloo, ON) testing machine. Three samples (approximately 7 × 7mm each) were harvested from the proximal, middle and distal regions along the length of the BA. Samples were tested on a biaxial testing machine while maintaining the alignment of the longitudinal collagen fiber orientation with the X-axis of the tester. The testing protocol included 10 preconditioning sinusoidal cycles at 9% strain, at a strain rate of 1%/s, followed by biaxial testing to a maximum strain of 12% at a strain rate of 1%/s. Young's modulus was quantified for all biaxial tests from the linear portion of the resulting stress-strain relation. Results showed that elastic modulus values were significantly greater in the longitudinal direction aligned with the collagen fibers. The outcomes of this study will provide input values for future models of distal biceps repair, thus aiding surgical planning by providing insight into the potential load sharing contributions of the BA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials→Same topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→