MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405632552 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2024.3514745

A 26-GΩ Input-Impedance 112-dB Dynamic-Range Two-Step Direct-Conversion Front-End With Improved Δ-Modulation for Wearable Biopotential Acquisition

2024· article· en· W4405632552 on OpenAlexaff
Yuzhi Hao, Hua Fan, Yong Lian, Mingyi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOmegaElectrical impedanceModulation (music)Front (military)Wearable computerFront and back endsMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceOptoelectronicsAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringEmbedded systemMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a high dynamic range (DR) direct conversion front-end (Direct-FE) IC enabling the wearable acquisition of weak bio-potentials superposed onto large motion artifacts (MAs). The prototype IC has been fabricated in a standard 0.18-<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>m CMOS process. Benefiting from the proposed feedback (FB) two-step direct conversion architecture with an improved <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\Delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-modulation, as well as a novel differential difference amplifier (DDA) and a dynamic-element-matching (DEM) technique, it achieves a peak input range of 3.56 VPP, an input-referred noise (IRN) of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.2~{\mu }$ </tex-math></inline-formula>Vrms, an input impedance of 26 G<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\Omega $ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and a ±1.8-V electrode dc offset (EDO) tolerance, while consuming only 63-<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>W power. Compared with state-of-the-art Direct-FEs, the proposed work demonstrates an advanced DR (112 dB) and a competitive FOMDR (175 dB). The prototype IC has been validated based on in vivo experiments, demonstrating its capability for artifact-tolerant wearable bio-potential acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207