Estimation and Inference for Nonparametric Expected Shortfall Regression over RKHS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expected shortfall (ES) has emerged as an important metric for characterizing the tail behavior of a random outcome, specifically associated with rarer events that entail severe consequences. In climate science, the threats of flooding and heatwaves loom large, impacting natural environments and human communities. In actuarial studies, a key observation in modeling insurance claim sizes is that features exhibit distinct effects in explaining small and large claims. This paper concerns nonparametric expected shortfall regression as a class of statistical methods for tail learning. These methods directly target upper/lower tail averages and will empower practitioners to address complex questions that are beyond the reach of mean regression-based approaches. Using kernel ridge regression, we introduce a two-step nonparametric ES estimator that involves a plugged-in quantile function estimate without sample-splitting. We provide non-asymptotic estimation and Gaussian approximation error bounds, depending explicitly on the effective dimension, sample size, regularization parameters, and quantile estimation error. To construct pointwise confidence bands, we propose a fast multiplier bootstrap procedure and establish its validity. We demonstrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods through numerical experiments and an empirical study aimed at examining the heterogeneous effects of different air pollutants and meteorological factors on average and high PM2.5 concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".