Numerical Modeling of Water Flow in Permeable Friction Course Pavement During Rainfall Considering Rainfall Intensity and Suction Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study developed a numerical model to observe the water flow in permeable friction course pavement (PFCP) during rainfall events. The model was established based on FeniCS, which is widely known as an open-source computing platform for solving partial differential equations. The results showed that rainfall intensity significantly affected time for surface ponding in the PFCP. A higher rainfall intensity resulted in a lower time for surface ponding of the PFCP. The evaluation for the effect of suction pressure on the PFCP showed that the suction pressure in the PFCP had a remarkable effect on the time for surface ponding. As the suction pressure in the PFCP increased, the time for surface ponding increased. The results in this study are based on numerical modeling. In the future, further experimental studies in the laboratory and in the field are needed to validate the water flow in PFCP during rainfall events considering other factors such as permeability, rutting, and environmental factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".