MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405641106 · doi:10.36939/ir.202412191614

The Detection of Fusarium Head Blight in Multiple Species of Wheat Using a Multispectral UAV in Southern Manitoba

2024· dissertation· en· W4405641106 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ryan Lee Shirtliffe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageRemote sensingFusariumCanopyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiologyEcologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a fungal disease that affects cereals such as wheat, severely damaging the plant, reducing its yield and value, and potentially rendering it unsafe for human or animal consumption. Detection of FHB in wheat fields is essential due to the threat it presents to Canada’s agricultural production. UAV’s and remote sensing techniques have been adopted within precision agricultural approaches for canopy scale detection of the disease. These approaches have focused on the detection of the disease in a singular species of wheat in an experimental field. The goal set out by this thesis is the detection of FHB across a diversity of wheat species using a multispectral UAV in an experimental field, and the transfer of the detection model to a monoculture commercial wheat field. We collected multispectral UAV imagery, and ground-based measures of the state of FHB in randomly sampled plots in both the experimental and commercial fields. A selection of 15 Vegetation Indices (VIs) were then extracted from the multispectral imagery, chosen for their past FHB detection performance. Three supervised machine learning classification models were selected, support vector machines, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting based on their prior applications in disease detection in wheat. We determined a set of Key VIs sensitive to FHB across wheat species using Spearman’s Ranked correlation, feature importance in RF and XGB models, and replacement sampling. These key VIs along side the ground-based measures were used for the training and testing of the FHB detection models, and applied to the experimental and commercial field. In our results Green Leaf Index (GLI), Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (ARI), Plant Senescence Reflectance Index – red-edge (PSRI-RE), and Enhanced vegetation index (EVI) emerged as the Key VIs for their effectiveness across wheat species. Amongst the three models, XGB offered the greatest overall accuracy at 87% for disease detection, but all models were successful in distinguishing healthy and FHB diseased wheat in the experimental field. When applied to the commercial field, the models successfully distinguished healthy from non-healthy stressed wheat, but had difficulty with the interrow spacing from the experimental site. In this thesis we successfully detected FHB across a diverse collection of wheat species, and identify challenges when transferring from an experimental to commercial field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→