PosE-Enhanced Point Transformer with Local Surface Features (LSF) for Wood–Leaf Separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wood–leaf separation from forest LiDAR point clouds is a challenging task due to the complex and irregular structures of tree canopies. Traditional machine vision and deep learning methods often struggle to accurately distinguish between fine branches and leaves. This challenge arises primarily from the lack of suitable features and the limitations of existing position encodings in capturing the unique and intricate characteristics of forest point clouds. In this work, we propose an innovative approach that integrates Local Surface Features (LSF) and a Position Encoding (PosE) module within the Point Transformer (PT) network to address these challenges. We began by preprocessing point clouds and applying a machine vision technique, supplemented by manual correction, to create wood–leaf-separated datasets of forest point clouds for training. Next, we introduced Point Feature Histogram (PFH) to construct LSF for each point network input, while utilizing Fast PFH (FPFH) to enhance computational efficiency. Subsequently, we designed a PosE module within PT, leveraging trigonometric dimensionality expansion and Random Fourier Feature-based Transformation (RFFT) for nuanced feature analysis. This design significantly enhances the representational richness and precision of forest point clouds. Afterward, the segmented branch point cloud was used to model tree skeletons automatically, while the leaves were incorporated to complete the digital twin. Our enhanced network, tested on three different types of forests, achieved up to 96.23% in accuracy and 91.51% in mean intersection over union (mIoU) in wood–leaf separation, outperforming the original PT by approximately 5%. This study not only expands the limits of forest point cloud research but also demonstrates significant improvements in the reconstruction results, particularly in capturing the intricate structures of twigs, which paves the way for more accurate forest resource surveys and advanced digital twin construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".