Predicting early stage lung cancer recurrence and survival from combined tumor motion amplitude and radiomics on free‐breathing 4D‐CT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer control outcomes of lung cancer are hypothesized to be affected by several confounding factors, including tumor heterogeneity and patient history, which have been hypothesized to mitigate the dose delivery effectiveness when treated with radiation therapy. Providing an accurate predictive model to identify patients at risk would enable tailored follow-up strategies during treatment. PURPOSE: Our goal is to demonstrate the added prognostic value of including tumor displacement amplitude in a predictive model that combines clinical features and computed tomography (CT) radiomics for 2-year recurrence and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy. METHODS: A cohort of 381 patients treated for primary lung cancer with radiotherapy was collected, each including a planning CT with a dosimetry plan, 4D-CT, and clinical information. From this cohort, 101 patients (26.5%) experienced cancer progression (locoregional/distant metastasis) or death within 2 years of the end of treatment. Imaging data was analyzed for radiomics features from the tumor segmented image, as well as tumor motion amplitude measured on 4D-CT. A random forest (RF) model was developed to predict the overall outcomes, which was compared to three other approaches - logistic regression, support vector machine, and convolutional neural networks. RESULTS: A 6-fold cross-validation study yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 72% for progression-free survival when combining clinical data with radiomics features and tumor motion using a RF model (72% sensitivity and 81% specificity). The combined model showed significant improvement compared to standard clinical data. Model performances for loco-regional recurrence and overall survival sub-outcomes were established at 73% and 70%, respectively. No comparative methods reached statistical significance in any data configuration. CONCLUSIONS: Combined tumor respiratory motion and radiomics features from planning CT showed promising predictive value for 2-year tumor control and survival, indicating the potential need for improving motion management strategies in future studies using machine learning-based prognosis models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".