Arthroscopic vs Open Ankle Arthrodesis: The Canadian Multi-Center Long Term Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: This multi-center study aimed to compare complication rates, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) in treating end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods: This was a prospectively collected retrospective study utilizing data from three medical centers in the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) database. Primary ankle arthrodeses for the treatment of end-stage arthritis with a minimum of 2 years follow up and valid PROM scores were included. Preoperative COFAS ankle arthritis type, validated PROMs including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) with 2 components (the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)), as well as major complications including malunion, nonunion, infection, amputations, and reoperations related to the arthrodesis were evaluated using CROCS (Canadian Reoperation Coding System). Results: 2,835 prospectively enrolled patients who underwent surgical treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis (COFAS Types 1-4) from 2001 to 2020 were screened. 447 ankle arthrodeses were included (178 AAA, 269 OAA) with 1-15 years of followup (7.13 yrs +/- 3.8). There was no difference between the two groups in demographics except more cases of type 1 and 4 arthritis in OAA group. There was a 6.9% incidence of major complications (3.79% related operations around the ankle, 0.67% deep infection, 1.78% revisions for nonunion/malunion, 0.67% amputations). For the 4 types of arthritis, AOS score improved significantly at 1 year, stabilized in type 1 group, but fluctuated in the remaining 3 types of arthritis after 8 years postoperatively. Average postoperative AOS score was better in the AAA group. Conclusion: Better outcomes were found for the arthroscopic cohort. However differences may be less after correction for confounding factors such as surgeon, site, and COFAS grade. Revision surgery is rare in both groups. AOS Treated Total Scores in Arthroscopic versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis Groups
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".