Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo propõe uma visão crítica que valoriza quase duas dezenas de textos especialmente dirigidos ao público infantil que ficcionalizam a Revolução dos Cravos de diferentes formas, nalguns casos aludindo aos seus antecedentes e contrastando-os com o período posterior à instauração da democracia O corpus textual é constituído por livros/textos de autores portugueses relevantes, como Manuel António Pina, António Torrado, Luísa Ducla Soares, José Jorge Letria ou João Pedro Mésseder, e por ilustradores, como Manuela Bacelar, Marta Madureira, João Caetano ou André Letria Trata-se de um conjunto notável de obras de elevada qualidade estético-literária, importantes na formação da competência literária e no processo de educação literária Envolvem e desafiam o leitor, contribuindo para a preservação da memória e desempenhando também um papel fundamental no estímulo à leitura do texto-mundo, tão necessário às gerações mais novas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".