Mapping of Western Valles Marineris Light‐Toned Layered Deposits and Newly Classified Rim Deposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Layered deposits are found on the plateaus surrounding the western portion of Valles Marineris, mantling the chasmata rims. These rim deposits exhibit intricate layering and are described as light-toned layered deposits (LLDs) in previous studies. Light-toned layered deposits are thought to be composed of pyroclastic ash that was emplaced during volcanic eruptions and later chemically altered. Using Shallow Radar (SHARAD) observations to map radar reflections from what appears to be the base of these deposits, we discovered two additional types of rim deposits that are contiguous with the well-known LLDs; weakly layered deposits (WLDs) that exhibit less obvious stratification and completely unstratified deposits designated as nonlayered deposits (NDs). Complementing the SHARAD data with imagery from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) and Context Camera (CTX) and with narrow-angle imagery from the Mars Global Surveyor Mars Observer Camera (MOC-NA), we mapped the full extent of all rim deposits and present the finished map within this study. We hypothesize that all three deposits originate from pyroclastic ashfall but experienced different degrees of modification due to the variable presence of liquid water. This hypothesis requires a source of volcanic depositional material and past aqueous environments in regions with LLDs and WLDs. We discuss the potential for several large Tharsis volcanoes and a hypothesized degraded volcano within Noctis Labyrinthus as sources of the ash, and we examine the evidence for past aqueous environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".