La culture scientifique et les visites scolaires au musée : représentations sociales des guides et du corps enseignant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude concerne les contenus de la culture scientifique au sein de visites scolaires dans les musées de sciences. Plus précisément, l’article étudie les représentations sociales des enseignants et enseignantes de l’école primaire française et celles des guides des musées de sciences à partir de données recueillies par questionnaires. L’analyse de leurs attentes autour des contenus de la culture scientifique montrent des points de convergences mais également des points de divergence notables. Les contenus évoqués comprennent des aspects scientifiques, des compétences sociales et civiques, des contenus liés aux musées, des connaissances génériques et des contenus culturels. Le corps enseignant et les guides accordent une importance particulière aux contenus disciplinaires scientifiques, bien que leurs images de la science puissent différer. Les résultats mettent en évidence l'importance des représentations sociales dans la construction des contenus des visites scolaires et interrogent les frontières entre l’école et le musée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".