MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ecos de la inauguración del monumento a José Enrique Rodó. La visión de los uruguayos sobre Rodó a mediados de siglo XX.

2022· article· es· W4405672263 on OpenAlexaff
Cecilia Arias Polnitsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuario del Área Socio-Jurídica · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Culture and Identity
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo aborda la visión que sobre José Enrique Rodó tenían los uruguayos a mediados del siglo XX a partir de la investigación realizada en la prensa sobre la recepción que tuvo el monumento homenaje al escritor ubicado en el Parque Rodó en el momento en que se inauguró, el 27 de febrero de 1947. Recoge las ideas sobre y de Rodó que expresaron los periodistas, los políticos e integrantes de distintas organizaciones sociales y reflexiona sobre la función que le atribuían al monumento en el espacio público, de la materialización de las conmemoraciones como lugares de memoria y de construcción de la identidad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnuario del Área Socio-JurídicaSame topicSpanish Culture and IdentityFrench-language works237,207