Towards the implementation and interpretation of masked ICA for identifying signatures of autonomic activation in the brainstem with resting-state BOLD fMRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The brainstem is the site of key exchanges between the autonomic and central nervous systems but has historically presented a challenging target for study with BOLD fMRI. A potentially powerful although under-characterized approach to identifying nucleic activation within the brainstem is masked independent component analysis (mICA), which restricts signal decomposition to the brainstem itself, thus aiming to reduce the strong effect of physiological noise in nearby regions such as ventricles and large arteries. In this study, we systematically investigate the use of mICA to uncover signatures of autonomic activation in the brainstem at rest. We apply mICA on 40 subjects in a high-resolution resting state 7T dataset following different strategies for dimensionality selection, denoising, and component classification. We show that among the noise mitigation techniques investigated, cerebrospinal fluid denoising makes the largest impact in terms of mICA outcomes. We further demonstrate that across preprocessing pipelines and previously reported results the majority of components are spatially reproducible, but temporal outcomes differ widely depending on denoising strategy. Evaluating both hand-labelling and whole-brain specificity criteria, we develop an intuitive framework for mICA classifications. Finally, we make a comparison between mICA and atlas-based segmentations of brainstem nuclei, finding little consistency between these two approaches. Based on our evaluation of the effects of methodology on mICA and its relationship to other signals of interest in the brainstem, we provide recommendations for future uses of mICA to identify autonomically-relevant BOLD fluctuations in subcortical structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".