Hierarchical Interpretation of Out-of-Distribution Cells Using Bottlenecked Transformer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Identifying the genetic and molecular drivers of phenotypic heterogeneity among individuals is vital for understanding human health and for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating diseases. To this end, international consortia such as the Human Cell Atlas and the Tabula Sapiens are creating comprehensive cellular references. Due to the massive volume of data generated, machine learning methods, especially transformer architectures, have been widely employed in related studies. However, applying machine learning to cellular data presents several challenges. One such challenge is making the methods interpretable with respect to both the input cellular information and its context. Another less explored challenge is the accurate representation of cells outside existing references, referred to as out-of-distribution (OOD) cells. The out-of-distribution could be attributed to various physiological conditions, such as comparing diseased cells, particularly tumor cells, with healthy reference data, or significant technical variations, such as using transfer learning from single-cell reference to spatial query data. Inspired by the global workspace theory in cognitive neuroscience, we introduce CellMemory, a bottlenecked Transformer with improved generalization capabilities designed for the hierarchical interpretation of OOD cells unseen during reference building. Even without pre-training, it exceeds the performance of large language models pre-trained with tens of millions of cells. In particular, when deciphering spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomics data, CellMemory demonstrates the ability to interpret data at the granule level accurately. Finally, we harness CellMemory’s robust representational capabilities to elucidate malignant cells and their founder cells in different patients, providing reliable characterizations of the cellular changes caused by the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".