MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405674900 · doi:10.24908/pceea.2024.18631

A reflection on Deep Tech Innovation Process: A Case Study on Instructors and Participants of a University Educational Program

2024· article· en· W4405674900 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Tate Cao, Tom Kishchuk, Kara Friesen, Grant T. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersInnovation Saskatchewan
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)Process (computing)Mathematics educationEngineeringEngineering managementMedical educationPsychologySociologyPedagogyComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern economies are driven by innovation to create key differentiators. As a result, Deep Tech that is being developed in academic and research institutions is receiving more attention as a potential new source of economic development as well as ways to solve industrial and societal challenges. In this paper, we will reflect on our experience to foster Deep Tech Entrepreneurship at the University of Saskatchewan. We will reflect on the progression of how the program has been set up and has evolved over time, the challenges and need for a common language, progress to develop the entrepreneurs, as well as how collaboration with broader non-academic communities was used to enhance the program. This paper aims to provide an overview of the program with the goal of fostering more conversations around best practices for entrepreneurial development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicEducation and Learning InterventionsFrench-language works237,207