MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405679178 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2024-261985

Advanced cutaneous angiosarcoma with a <i>TRIM24::BRAF</i> gene fusion treated with trametinib

2024· article· en· W4405679178 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Murphy, Maya Pankiw, Nicole Gibbings, Lingxin Zhang, Geoffrey Alan Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrametinibMedicineSarcomaAngiosarcomaFusion geneBiopsyPathologySkin biopsyCancer researchOncologyRadiologyGeneBiologyMAPK/ERK pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A postmenopausal woman presented with a painful, erythematous rash affecting her head and neck. CT imaging revealed diffuse areas of skin thickening affecting her face and neck, and necrotic lymphadenopathy. Additional imaging revealed several osteolytic bone lesions. Biopsy reported a malignant vascular neoplasm, suggestive of angiosarcoma. Molecular analysis reported a TRIM24::BRAF gene fusion. After progression on first-line paclitaxel, the MEK inhibitor trametinib was administered, resulting in an excellent clinical and radiological response. This case reports a novel gene fusion, to our knowledge, the first reported in sarcoma, and highlights the utility and importance of molecular profiling in obtaining access to a treatment that may not otherwise be considered in standard site-specific therapeutic regimens, where therapeutic options may be limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicVascular Tumors and AngiosarcomasFrench-language works237,207