MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405695868 · doi:10.22323/1.476.0665

Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment: Towards the first detector lines

2024· article· en· W4405695868 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Felix Henningsen, M. Danninger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNarodowym Centrum NaukiEuropean CommissionCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDetectorPacific oceanNeutrinoOceanographyComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment (P-ONE) is a planned cubic-kilometer deep-sea detector targeting the study of high-energy neutrinos, their sources, and their unknown acceleration mechanisms. With low expected scattering in the deep sea, the ocean is an ideal location for high-energy neutrino detectors with the potential for sub-degree angular resolution. However, operating large-scale infrastructure in deep waters carries various challenges. With ever-changing ocean currents, detection lines will sway through the water column, effectively resulting in time-variable detector geometry, water properties, and optical backgrounds. Together with Ocean Networks Canada, P-ONE aims to install long-lived sub-sea photosensor and calibration instrumentation, to enable continuous and precise neutrino detection. In this talk, we will present the ongoing development of the first P-ONE detector line, its instrumentation, and the expected performance of the first cluster of P-ONE lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207