MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405700670 · doi:10.1002/alz.14443

Identification of circulating risk biomarkers for cognitive decline in a large community‐based population in Chongqing China

2024· article· en· W4405700670 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Kang, Zijuan Feng, Qian Zhang, Mingjing Liu, Yanhua Li, Huan Yang, Lingling Zheng, Weitao Zhou, Dandan Lou, Xiaoyong Li, Liangping Chen, Yijun Feng, Xiaoling Duan, Jianzhong Duan, Mengjiao Yu, Shou Yang, Yuhang Liu, Xin Wang, Bo Deng, Chenghui Liu, Xiu‐Qing Yao, Chi Zhu, Chun‐Rong Liang, Xiaolong Zeng, Sisi Ren, Qunying Li, Yin Zhong, Yong Yan, Huaqing Meng, Zhaohui Zhong, Yong Zhang, Junren Kang, Xiaoqian Luan, Sipei Pan, Yi-li Wu, Tingyu Li, Weihong Song, Yun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDementiaCognitive declineMedicineGerontologyCognitionCohortPopulationStroke (engine)DiseaseInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the relationship between blood-based pathologies and established risk factors for cognitive decline in the community-based population of Chongqing, a region with significant aging. METHODS: A total of 26,554 residents aged 50 years and older were recruited. Multinomial logistic regression models were applied to assess the risk factors of cognition levels. Propensity score matching and linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the relationship between key risk factors and the circulating biomarkers. RESULTS: Shared and distinct risk factors for MCI and dementia were identified. Age, lower education, medical history of stroke, hypertension, and epilepsy influenced mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression to dementia. Correlations between key risk factors and circulating neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), amyloid β protein (Aβ)40, and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio suggest underlying mechanisms contributing to cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION: The common and distinct risk factors across cognitive decline stages emphasize the need for tailored interventions. The correlations with blood biomarkers provide insights into potential management targets. HIGHLIGHTS: From a large community-based cohort study on the residents in Chongqing, we have identified that mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia share several common risk factors, including age, female gender, rural living, lower education levels, and a medical history of stroke. However, each condition also has its own unique risk factors. Several factors contribute to the progression of MCI into dementia including age, education levels, occupation, and a medical history of hypertension and epilepsy. We discover the correlations between the risk factors for dementia and blood biomarkers that indicate the presence of axonal damage, glial activation, and Aβ pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207