Real-Time Freezing of Gait Prediction and Detection in Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a walking disturbance that can lead to postural instability, falling, and decreased mobility in people with Parkinson’s disease. This research used machine learning to predict and detect FOG episodes from plantar-pressure data and compared the performance of decision tree ensemble classifiers when trained on three different datasets. Dataset 1 (n = 11) was collected in a previous study. Dataset 2 (n = 10) included six new participants and four participants from Dataset 1 who were re-tested (approximately 2 years later), and Dataset 3 (n = 21) combined Datasets 1 and 2. The prediction model trained on Dataset 3 had a 2.28% higher sensitivity and 3.09% lower specificity compared to the models trained on Dataset 1. The model trained on Dataset 3 identified 86.84% of the total FOG episodes compared to 74.31% from the model trained on Dataset 1. Also, the model using Dataset 3 identified the FOG episodes 0.3 s earlier than the model developed with Dataset 1. The model trained using Dataset 3 showed improved performance in sensitivity, identification time, and FOG identification. The improvements using the expanded dataset (Dataset 3) in this study compared to the previous model reinforce the validity and generalizability of the original model. The model was able to predict and detect FOG well and is, therefore, ready to be implemented in a FOG prevention device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".