MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405713401 · doi:10.29173/hsi467

The effects of the pandemic on carbon dioxide emissions and the ozone layer

2022· article· en· W4405713401 on OpenAlex
Peter Anto Johnson, John C. Johnson, Francis Fernandes, A. A. Mardon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Science Inquiry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOzoneCarbon dioxideOzone layerEnvironmental sciencePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Layer (electronics)Atmospheric sciencesMeteorologyChemistryMedicineMaterials scienceGeologyNanotechnologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amidst the growing public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic, widespread lockdowns and travel restriction measures have drastically reduced levels of greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – many of which have an ozone depleting effect with evidence of holes in the ozone layer closing. By consequence, the findings and data recorded throughout the course of the pandemic has numerous implications for human health, the environment, and strategies moving forward. In this commentary, we review the impact of COVID-19 across a number of regions across the world and what lessons we can anticipate integrating in the context of policy and public health interventions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it