MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405713422 · doi:10.29173/hsi476

The psychological impacts of climate change on Indian farmers and the danger of the farm bills

2022· article· en· W4405713422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kathryn Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Science Inquiry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAgricultural economicsNatural resource economicsEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Indian farmer protests present a unique opportunity to further discuss the psychological impacts of climate change on farmers, and the importance of governance that protects farmers and allows them to thrive and continue to produce in a sustainable way. The introduction of the Indian Agriculture Acts of 2020, or Farm Bills, could exacerbate the already prevalent mental health challenges faced by Indian farmers. This commentary aims to provide an overview of the intersections between farmer mental health, climate change, and the Farm Bills. Evidence on farmer mental health, climate change, and the Farm Bills is then used to provide recommendations to the Indian government on how to better support farmers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Science InquirySame topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207