MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405715721 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083021

Discriminating between different modified dispersion relations from gamma-ray observations

2025· article· en· W4405715721 on OpenAlexafffund
Sami Caroff, Christian Pfeifer, J. Bolmont, T. Terzić, A. Campoy-Ordaz, D. Kerszberg, M. Martı́nez, U. Pensec, C. Plard, Jelena Strišković

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversidad de ZaragozaCompute CanadaHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSveučilište u Rijeci
KeywordsRedshiftPhysicsLagPhotonDispersion relationLambdaDispersion (optics)Statistical physicsSpacetimeAstrophysicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fact that the standard dispersion relation for photons in vacuum could be modified because of their interaction with the quantum nature of spacetime has been proposed more than two decades ago. A quantitative model by Jacob and Piran has been tested extensively using distant highly energetic astrophysical sources, searching for energy-dependent time delays in photon arrival times. Since no delay was firmly measured, lower limits were set on the energy scale $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ related to these effects. In recent years, however, different but equally well-grounded expressions beyond the Jacob and Piran model were obtained for the photon dispersion relation, leading to different expressions for the dependence of lag versus redshift. This article introduces a general parametrization of modified dispersion relations in homogeneous and isotropic, i.e. cosmological, symmetry which directly leads to a general parametrized lag versus redshift dependence encompassing both existing and new models. This parametrization could be used in the future to compare the predicted time lags of the different models and test them against observations. To investigate this possibility, realistic datasets are simulated, mimicking different types of extragalactic sources as detected by current and future instruments. When no lag is injected in the simulated data, each lag-redshift model leads, as expected, to a different value for the limit on $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$, and the Jacob and Piran model gives the most stringent bound. When a lag at $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\ensuremath{\sim}{E}_{P}$ in the Jacob and Piran model is injected, it is detected for all the other lag-redshift relations considered, although leading to different values. Finally, the possibility to discriminate between several lag-redshift models is investigated, emphasizing the importance of an evenly distributed sample of sources across a wide range of redshifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207