Aktivasi Subang sebagai Habitat Ekosistem Angklung Ragam Laras: Studi Kasus pada Sanggar Toléater | Activation of Subang as an Ecosystem Habitat for Angklung Ragam Laras: A Case Study of Sanggar Toléater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Setelah ditetapkannya angklung sebagai warisan budaya dunia oleh UNESCO, maka ada konsekuensi bagi Indonesia untuk melindungi, mengembangkan, memanfaatkan, dan membina kehidupan angklung. Salah satu upaya dalam menghadapi konsekwensi tersebut, dilakukan aktivasi ekosistem angklung ragam laras di Kabupaten Subang sebagai upaya pengembangan agar angklung sebagai warisan dunia dapat terjaka eksistensinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan eksperimantasi, dengan cara memberikan pelatihan terhadap Sanggar Toleater melalui proses sosialisasi, pengumpulan data, pelatihan karya, hingga workshop tata kelola seni yang diakhiri dengan evaluasi, diharapkan dengan pendekatan ini kejian sekaligus eksperimentasi ini dapat melindungi kehidupan angklung yang hidup secara berkelanjutan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".