MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405717367 · doi:10.1109/trs.2024.3521814

Wave Height Estimation From Radar Images Under Rainy Conditions Based on Context-Aware Segmentation and Iterative Dehazing

2024· article· en· W4405717367 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Radar Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsSegmentationContext (archaeology)RadarComputer scienceEstimationImage segmentationRadar imagingComputer visionIterative methodArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingGeologyAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a novel approach to mitigate the impact of rain on significant wave height (SWH) measurements using X-band marine radar. First, the proposed method uses a transformer-based segmentation model, SegFormer, to divide radar images into four distinct regions: clear wave signatures, rain-contaminated areas, low backscatter areas, and wind-dominated rain areas. Given that radar wave signatures in rain-contaminated regions are significantly blurred, this segmentation step identifies regions with clear wave signatures, ensuring subsequent analysis to be more accurate. Next, an iterative dehazing method, which adaptively enhances image clarity based on gradient standard deviation (GSD), is applied to achieve optimal dehazing effects. Finally, the segmented and dehazed polar radar images are transformed into the Cartesian coordinates, where subimages from valid regions are selected for SWH estimation using the SWHFormer model. The radar dataset used for test was collected from a shipborne Decca radar in a sea area 300 km from Halifax, Canada, in 2008. The SegFormer model demonstrates superior segmentation performance, with 1.3% improvement in accuracy compared with the SegNet-based method. Besides, the iterative dehazing method significantly reduces haze effects in heavily contaminated images, outperforming traditional one-time dehazing methods in both precision and robustness for SWH estimation. Results show that the combination of segmentation and iterative dehazing reduces the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of SWH estimation from 0.42 and 0.33 to 0.28 m, compared with the existing support vector regression (SVR)-based and convolutional gated recurrent unit (CGRU)-based methods, and improves the correlation coefficient (CC) to 0.96. These advancements underscore the potential of integrating segmentation and adaptive dehazing for enhanced radar-based ocean monitoring under challenging meteorological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it