MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405717800 · doi:10.1109/tec.2024.3521289

A Neural-Network-Based Electric Machine Emulator Using Neuro-Fuzzy Controller for Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing

2024· article· en· W4405717800 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadi Mohajerani, Uday Deshpande, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsArtificial neural networkNeuro-fuzzyControl engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Electric power systemFuzzy control systemFuzzy logicPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emulation of permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) is critical for the advancement of power electronics and drive converter testing, particularly within power-hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) platform. Despite significant progress, and developing accurate machine models, the amount of resources and memory used by these accurate models are not ideal for real-time applications due to added latency. Hence, a research gap exists in developing models that while accurately and efficiently replicate the dynamic behaviors of the machine model under various operating conditions, are light in resource usage. This paper addresses this gap by introducing an artificial neural network (ANN)-based machine modeling approach and combines it with a neuro-fuzzy-based control strategy to ensure robust and precise performance of the system, that is to minimize the error between the electric machine emulators (EME) and physical PMSM test results. The ANN model requires only 0.68 KB of memory compared to the 4 MB needed for traditional 1,000 × 1,000 LUT-based models, which incur greater latency due to cache limitations and interpolation demands despite lower floating-point operation (FLOP) requirements. By using this optimized ANN model with an adaptive ANFIS controller, the proposed system So, the main objective is to enhance the performance and accuracy of EMEs in PHIL testing environments. The ANN model provides a resource-efficient yet precise representation of the PMSM, while the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)-based controller dynamically adjusts its membership functions to adapt to changing system dynamics and loading conditions and provide proper control command.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207