Load Optimization for Connected Modern Buildings Using Deep Hybrid Machine Learning in Island Mode
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines Connected Smart Green Buildings (CSGBs) in Burnaby, BC, Canada, with a focus on townhouses with one to four bedrooms. The proposed model integrates sustainable materials and smart components such as recycled insulation, Photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, smart meters, and high-efficiency systems. These elements improve energy efficiency and promote sustainability. Operating in island mode, CSGBs can function independently of the grid, providing resilience during power outages and reducing reliance on external energy sources. Real data on electricity, gas, and water consumption are used to optimize load management under isolated conditions. Electric Vehicles (EVs) are also considered in the system. They serve as energy storage devices and, through Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology, can supply power when needed. A hybrid Machine Learning (ML) model combining Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is proposed to improve the performance. The metrics considered include accuracy, efficiency, emissions, and cost. The performance was compared with several well-known models including Linear Regression (LR), CNN, LSTM, Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and hybrid LSTM–CNN, and the results show that the proposed model provides the best results. For a four-bedroom Connected Smart Green Townhouse (CSGT), the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) is 4.43%, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is 3.49 kWh, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is 3.06 kWh, and R2 is 0.81. These results indicate that the proposed model provides robust load optimization, particularly in island mode, and highlight the potential of CSGBs for sustainable urban living.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".