UAV Trajectory Control and Power Optimization for Low-Latency C-V2X Communications in a Federated Learning Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled vehicular communications in the sixth generation (6G) are characterized by line-of-sight (LoS) and dynamically varying channel conditions. However, the presence of obstacles in the LoS path leads to shadowed fading environments. In UAV-assisted cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication, vehicle and UAV mobility and shadowing adversely impact latency and throughput. Moreover, 6G vehicular communications comprise data-intensive applications such as augmented reality, mixed reality, virtual reality, intelligent transportation, and autonomous vehicles. Since vehicles' sensors generate immense amount of data, the latency in processing these applications also increases, particularly when the data are not independently identically distributed (non-i.i.d.). Furthermore, when the sensors' data are heterogeneous in size and distribution, the incoming packets demand substantial computing resources, energy efficiency at the UAV servers and intelligent mechanisms to queue the incoming packets. Due to the limited battery power and coverage range of UAV, the quality of service (QoS) requirements such as coverage rate, UAV flying time, and fairness of vehicle selection are adversely impacted. Controlling the UAV trajectory so that it serves a maximum number of vehicles while maximizing battery power usage is a potential solution to enhance QoS. This paper investigates the system performance and communication disruption between vehicles and UAV due to Doppler effect in the orthogonal time-frequency space (OTFS) modulated channel. Moreover, a low-complexity UAV trajectory prediction and vehicle selection method is proposed using federated learning, which exploits related information from past trajectories. The weighted total energy consumption of a UAV is minimized by jointly optimizing the transmission window (Lw), transmit power and UAV trajectory considering Doppler spread. The simulation results reveal that the weighted total energy consumption of the OTFS-based system decreases up to 10% when combined with federated learning to locally process the sensor data at the vehicles and communicate the processed local models to the UAV. The weighted total energy consumption of the proposed federated learning algorithm decreases by 10-15% compared with convex optimization, heuristic, and meta-heuristic algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".