Stabilizing complex-Langevin field-theoretic simulations for block copolymer melts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex-Langevin field-theoretic simulations (CL-FTSs) provide an approximation-free method of calculating fluctuation corrections to the self-consistent field theory (SCFT) of block copolymer melts. However, the complex fields are prone to the formation of hot spots, which causes the method to fail. This problem has been attributed to an invariance under complex translations, which allows the system to drift away from the real-valued saddle-point of SCFT. Here, we apply dynamical stabilization to CL-FTSs of diblock copolymer melts, whereby the drift is suppressed by a small imaginary force on the composition field. The force needs to be sufficient to hold the system near the real saddle-point but also small enough not to significantly bias the statistics. Although larger forces are required as the fluctuations become more intense, we are able to lower the invariant polymerization indices of the CL-FTSs by several orders of magnitude before this becomes a problem. The new CL-FTS results are then used to test conventional Langevin simulations (L-FTSs), in which the instability is removed by a partial saddle-point approximation to the pressure field. As found previously, the L-FTSs agree accurately with the CL-FTSs, provided that the comparison is performed using a Morse calibration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".