MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405726833 · doi:10.3329/ijss.v24i20.78210

Uniformly Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimators (UMVUE) Not Attaining Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds

2024· article· en· W4405726833 on OpenAlexaff
Subhash Bagui, K. L. Mehra

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistical Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of West Florida
KeywordsMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorCramér–Rao boundStatisticsEstimatorMathematicsVariance (accounting)Best linear unbiased predictionBias of an estimatorComputer scienceEconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main thrust of this article is to provide counterexamples where the variance of the UMVUE does not achieve the Cramer-Rao lower bound. We provided many motivating counterexamples and showed that these UMVU estimators are, in fact, asymptotically efficient estimators. All counterexamples are new or may not be available in standard textbooks. To illustrate the entire process, we supplied many definitions related to UMVUE and described various methods and step-by-step approaches for finding UMVUE’s. In concluding remarks, we also gave a short biography of Professor C.R. Rao. It is hoped that the article will have pedagogical value in courses on statistical inference. IJSS, Vol. 24(2) Special, December, 2024, pp 1-18

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistical SciencesSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207