MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405727684 · doi:10.12691/ijcd-12-1-4

Sprue-Like and Other Intestinal Diseases in the Common Variable Immunodeficiency (Cvid) Spectrum

2024· article· en· W4405727684 on OpenAlexaff
Hugh James Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Celiac Disease · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon variable immunodeficiencyMedicineSprueBroad spectrumImmunologyGeneticsBiologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many forms of immunodeficiency have been described. There may be about 150 different types, some with inherited or genetic causes, some with recognized specific molecular defects. Most can be classified as affecting the humoral or cellular, sometimes both, immune systems. In adults, the most common symptomatic form, albeit rare, is common variable immunodeficiency, or CVID. In recent years, it has also been suggested that rather than a single disease, CVID represents a heterogeneous group marked by panhypogammaglobulinemia and variable clinical features. In most, intestinal symptoms predominate, including, but not limited to sprue-like intestinal disease, a disorder that fails to respond to a gluten-free diet. Also, several types of colonic disease may occur similar to ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and, most recently reported, collagenous colitis. Treatment of these disorders remains largely empirical and based on disease seen in the absence of CVID. Added molecular genetic studies are needed to more fully characterize the immune defects in CVID and, ultimately, to provide more evidence-based treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Celiac DiseaseSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207