MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improving the Accuracy of Temperature Distribution Images Using an Infrared Camera with SLAM

2022· article· en· W4405744250 on OpenAlexaff
Shota IDESAKI, Daiki SHIOZAWA, Takahide SAKAGAMI, Y. Uchida

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of Conference of Kansai Branch · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfraredComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

建物の構造体には,スケルトン保護や美観を目的として,タイルやモルタル工事などの外装仕上げが施されている.しかしながら,経年劣化により剥離したコンクリートやタイルなどの一部が落下して,重大な事故を引き起こす可能性がある.これを防ぐために、外観の目視検査や打音法による検査が行われているが,足場が必要であることや検査員の技量が診断精度に影響することなど,多くの問題がある.そこで,遠隔で検査ができるパッシブ赤外線サーモグラフィ法が使用されている.本手法では,太陽光や周囲の建物の背景反射成分により測定精度が低下するという問題がある.本研究では,SLAMによって位置推定を行い,方向を変えて撮影した赤外線画像を対象平面に逆射影することで反射低減を行う手法を開発した.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of Conference of Kansai BranchSame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207