MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405746603 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.111258

Ichnologic and sedimentologic datasets from the Ediacaran–Cambrian Chapel island formation, Newfoundland, Canada

2024· article· en· W4405746603 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Romain Gougeon, M. Gabriela Mángano, Luís A. Buatois, Guy M. Narbonne, Brittany A. Laing, Maximiliano Paz

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersInternational Association of SedimentologistsSociety for Sedimentary GeologyMacquarie UniversityPaleontological SocietyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeological Society of America
KeywordsTrace fossilGeologyCoveBioturbationPaleontologySedimentary rockPaleoecologySedimentary structuresStructural basinGeomorphologySedimentary depositional environmentSediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive ichnologic and sedimentologic datasets were gathered from six localities (Fortune Head, Fortune North, Grand Bank Head, Lewin's Cove, Little Dantzic Cove, and Point May) of the Ediacaran-Cambrian Chapel Island Formation at Burin Peninsula, southeastern Newfoundland, eastern Canada. 1708.2 m of sedimentary strata were logged at a centimeter scale (1:40) using a Jacob staff, in addition to 11.08 m of strata reported at a millimeter scale (1:1.67). Sedimentary logs focus on: (1) bed geometry; (2) bed thickness; (3) bed grain size; (4) sandstone/ mudstone ratio; and (5) sedimentary structures. For each log, trace-fossil datasets were reported, consisting of: (1) bioturbation intensity in cross-section (1596 data points); (2) bed surface bioturbation intensity (1481 data points); (3) stratigraphic position of individual trace fossils; (4) trace-fossil width (3164 data points); (5) trace-fossil depth (1539 data points); and (6) ichnotaxonomic classification (3510 trace fossils identified at ichnospecies rank). The datasets are of importance to researchers interested in the palaeoecological signals depicted in this classic Ediacaran-Cambrian succession or in the compilation of worldwide data for deciphering macro-evolutionary trends in early animal life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207