MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405754403 · doi:10.1109/tro.2024.3521862

Generative Graphical Inverse Kinematics

2024· article· en· W4405754403 on OpenAlexafffund
Oliver Limoyo, Filip Marić, Matthew Giamou, Petra Alexson, Ivan Petrović, Jonathan Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKinematicsInverse kinematicsInverseGenerative grammarComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsRobotGeometryClassical mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quickly and reliably finding accurate inverse kinematics (IK) solutions remains a challenging problem for many robot manipulators. Existing numerical solvers are broadly applicable but typically only produce a single solution and rely on local search techniques to minimize nonconvex objective functions. Recent learning-based approaches that approximate the entire feasible set of solutions have shown promise in generating multiple fast and accurate IK results in parallel. However, existing learning-based techniques have a significant drawback: each robot of interest requires a specialized model that must be trained from scratch. To address this key shortcoming, we propose a novel distance-geometric robot representation coupled with a graph structure that allows us to leverage the generalizability of graph neural networks (GNNs). Our approach, which we call generative graphical IK (GGIK), is the first learned IK solver that is able to efficiently yield a large number of diverse solutions in parallel while also displaying the ability to generalize—a single learned model can be used to produce IK solutions for a variety of different robots. When compared to several other learned IK methods, GGIK provides more accurate solutions with the same amount of training data. GGIK can also generalize reasonably well to robot manipulators unseen during training. In addition, GGIK is able to learn a constrained distribution that encodes joint limits and scales well with the number of robot joints and sampled solutions. Finally, GGIK can be used to complement local IK solvers by providing a reliable initialization for the local optimization process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on RoboticsSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207