MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405755186 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2024.3522039

400 Gbps/$\lambda$ O-Band Coherent Link Using SiP TX and RX PICs With Heterogeneously Integrated Lasers and SOAs

2024· article· en· W4405755186 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Misak, Aaron Wissing, Jinsong Zhang, Zixian Wei, Junqian Liu, Hector Andrade, Aaron Maharry, Giovanni Gilardi, Ranjeet Kumar, Guan-Lin Su, James F. Buckwalter, A.A.M. Saleh, Larry A. Coldren, David V. Plant, Clint L. Schow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAdvanced Research Projects Agency - EnergyU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLaserIntegrated opticsPhysicsLambdaOptoelectronicsSemiconductor laser theoryOptical communicationOpticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a net 400 Gbps/<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda$</tex-math></inline-formula> O-band, dual-polarization, intradyne coherent link using silicon photonic (SiP) transmitter and receiver photonic integrated circuits (PIC) with heterogeneously integrated lasers and semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA). Operation below the 15.3% overhead 2×10<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{-2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> open forward error correction (O-FEC) threshold was achieved for 60 Gbaud 16QAM over 2 km and 100 Gbaud QPSK over 10 km without external optical amplification. These results demonstrate the potential for implementing SiP PICs with integrated lasers and SOAs in future short-reach coherent links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207