MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405756898 · doi:10.25799/ni.2020.99.15.019

Принудительное медицинское вмешательство в Канаде

2020· article· ru· W4405756898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А.А. Соловьёв

Bibliographic record

VenueСовременное право. · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldPsychology
TopicHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEnforcementLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статья посвящена исследованию принудительного медицинского вмешательства в Канаде на примере провинций Британская Колумбия и Онтарио. Особое внимание автор уделяет вопросам правового регулирования соответствующих административных и судебных процедур, проблемам недобровольного лечения принудительно госпитализированных пациентов, а также гарантиям обеспечения их прав The article is dedicated to the study of involuntary medical treatment in Canada on example of the provinces of British Columbia and Ontario. Special focus is laid on the issues of legal regulation of the respective administrative and judicial procedures, the problems of forced treatment of involuntarily hospitalised patients, as well as the guarantees for the enforcement of their rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСовременное право.Same topicHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsFrench-language works237,207