Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vitamin D was discovered as the cure for nutritional rickets, a disease of bone growth arising from inadequate intestinal calcium absorption, and for much of the 20th century, it was studied for its critical role in calcium homeostasis. However, we now recognize that the vitamin D receptor and vitamin D metabolic enzymes are expressed in numerous tissues unrelated to calcium homeostasis. Notably, vitamin D signaling can induce cellular differentiation and cell cycle arrest. Moreover, the vitamin D receptor and the enzyme CYP27B1, which produces the hormonal form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D), are expressed throughout the immune system. In addition, CYP27B1 expression in immune cells is regulated by physiological inputs independent of those controlling its expression in calcium homeostatic tissues. These observations have driven the development of 1,25D-like secosteroidal analogs and nonsecosteroidal analogs to separate the effects of vitamin D on cell differentiation and function from its calcemic activities. Notably, some of these analogs have had considerable success in the clinic in the treatment of inflammatory and immune-related disorders. In this review, we described in detail the mechanisms of vitamin D signaling and the physiological signals controlling 1,25D synthesis and catabolism, with a focus on the immune system. We also surveyed the effects of 1,25D and its analogs on the regulation of immune system function and their implications for human immune-related disorders. Finally, we described the potential of vitamin D analogs as anticancer therapeutics, in particular, their use as adjuncts to cancer immunotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Vitamin D signaling is active in both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. Numerous vitamin D analogs, developed primarily to minimize the dose-limiting hypercalcemia of the active form of vitamin D, have been used widely in preclinical and clinical studies of immune system regulation. This review presents a description of the mechanisms of action of vitamin D signaling, an overview of analog development, and an in-depth discussion of the immunoregulatory roles of vitamin D analogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".