Mathematical modeling of microtube-driven regrowth of gliomas after local resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, glioblastoma tumors were shown to form tumor microtubes, which are thin, long protrusions that help the tumor grow and spread. Follow-up experiments were conducted on mice in order to test what impact the tumor microtubes have on tumor regrowth after the partial removal of a tumor region. The surgery was performed in isolation and along with growth-inhibiting treatments such as a tumor microtube-inhibiting treatment and an anti-inflammatory treatment. Here, we have proposed a partial differential equation model applicable to describe the microtube-driven regrowth of the cancer in the lesion. We found that the model is able to replicate the main trends seen in the experiments such as fast regrowth, larger cancer density in the lesion, and further spread into healthy tissue. The model indicates that the dominant mechanisms of re-growth are growth-inducing wound-healing mechanisms and the proliferative advantage from the tumor microtubes. In addition, tumor microtubes provide orientational guidance from the untreated tissue into the lesion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".