MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405760306 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-37.4.255

A Planck scale theory of time, with a fast early cosmological time rate, and rederivations for relativistic energy and time dilation

2024· article· en· W4405760306 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. M. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime dilationPhysicsSpacetimeSpeed of light (cellular automaton)Planck lengthTheory of relativityTheoretical physicsPlanck timePlanckGeneral relativityArrow of timeSpace timeUniversal TimeCosmologyEinsteinSupernovaAstrophysicsInflationary epochGalaxyClassical mechanicsQuantum gravityQuantumDark energyPlanck scaleQuantum mechanicsMetric expansion of spaceAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the issues to be resolved between general relativity and quantum mechanics are their differences about time. Block time has been weakened in two areas of its foundations recently: The small-scale reversibility has been falsified by experiments in quantum processes, and spacetime is now widely seen as emerging from unknown physics, rather than fundamental. This leaves room for differences to the nature of time. Here a theory of time is set out, in which light and matter arise in the small-scale structure of space, as waves in the dimensions themselves, traveling on the axes. It reinterprets special relativity, with two rederivations. The reasoning that led to block time, such as Penrose's version with three objects in one frame, is removed via a difference to frames that usually has no effect—the two observers are related to the event separately, as their relationships to it imply different, incompatible, positionings for the axes. This also leads to an explanation for light always moving at the same speed in relation to matter: With several objects moving differently, each is related to the light beam separately. In cosmology, new data suggest galaxies formed earlier than expected, with higher masses. And even earlier, inflation and variable speed of light theories both describe extremely rapid events. Planck scale time (PST) theory includes a specific mechanism for an overall time rate, which starts fast, then slows over time, and is consistent with supernova and gamma ray burst data. This allows galaxies more time to form, and in PST all matter's mass‐energy descends with the time rate (proportional time and energy changes in a gravitational field can be taken in the same way). This can also explain the “downsizing” sequence in galaxy formation, first described in 1996, in which stars in more massive galaxies formed earlier and quicker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics EssaysSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207